CNS Legislative Committee MEETING MINUTES - September 4, 2024

California Neurology Society CNS • April 4, 2025

September 4, 2024

Legislative Committee Meeting Minutes

Lecture by Paul Matthews, MD, NBPAS, FAAN, FAHS

Here is a summary of the meeting:

1. Background on Grandfathering and Certification:

- Historical use of the term “grandfathered in” and its implications in the medical community.

- Current statistics: 80% of grandfathered physicians are white and 70% male.

- Lifetime certificates by ABMS grant elite status to physicians, leading to disparities.

2. Introduction of MOC (Maintenance of Certification):

- Instituted in 2007 to ensure continuous education, requiring recertification through self-assessment, improvement modules, and CME.

- Criticism: Increased workload on physicians with no clear evidence of improving patient care or physician competence.

3. Impact of MOC on Physicians:

- MOC added stress amidst existing responsibilities like patient care, prior authorizations, research, EHR compliance, and teaching.

- Studies, including Mayo Clinic, showed limited efficacy of MOC. Less than 15% of doctors found it beneficial.

4. Economic and Workload Burdens:

- Cost analysis (Annals of Internal Medicine, 2014) showed significant financial burdens:

- Internists: $16,000 over 10 years.

- Hematologist-Oncologists: $40,000 over 10 years.

- Physicians lose substantial time from patient care due to MOC courses and assessments.

- Total burden estimated at 5.7 billion in fees and 33 million hours lost from 2015 to 2025.

5. ABMS and ABPN Conflicts:

- Lack of reform despite criticisms and calls for changes to MOC.

- Revenue and administrative expansion are driving factors for continued MOC requirements.

- Financial discrepancies in ABIM, with millions in salaries and losses but no tangible benefit for physicians.

6. Rise of NBPAS (National Board of Physicians and Surgeons):

- Founded in 2015 by 20 physicians as an alternative to ABMS.

- Offers streamlined, evidence-based CME certification without contributing to physician burnout.

- Costs: $169 per year for two years, covering all specialties.

- Accepted by over 200 hospitals and health systems. NCQA and The Joint Commission also recognize it.

7. Physician Burnout and Retaliation:

- MOC contributes to burnout, with 25% of physicians leaving practice within 5 years.

- NBPAS offers a sustainable model and encourages physicians to use their certification for advocacy.

8. New Developments in MOC:

- ABPN introduced “MOC 2.0,” offering the option to complete assessments every three years or take an exam every 10 years.

- AMA passed a resolution on MOC but took no significant action.

9. Advocacy and Legislative Action:

- Push for hospitals to recognize NBPAS as an alternative to ABPN certification.

- Leadership in organizations like AAN and APA is becoming more inclusive and may be more open to reform.

- Discussion on integrating certification reforms into legislative efforts (e.g., SB636).

10. Next Steps and Strategies:

- Continue collaborating with other state neurological societies to urge reform.

- Encourage physicians to promote NBPAS certification within their hospitals.

- Engage hospital credentialing committees using the available NBPAS resources for bylaw changes.

- Explore advocacy efforts within CMA and national organizations to support certification reform.



---



Action Items:

1. Collaboration with Hospitals:

- Explore strategies to persuade hospitals to adopt NBPAS certification for recruitment and retention purposes.

2. Support for Physicians:

- Advocate for reducing the burden of MOC and push for more evidence-based, cost-effective CME options.

3. Legislative Advocacy:

- Consider adding board certification requirements to legislative efforts like SB636.

- Leverage support from other physician groups, such as APA and CMA, in these reform efforts.

4. Follow-up Meetings:

- Next discussion scheduled for September 18, 2024, to further address certification and legislative strategies.

---



The term Grandfather or “Grandfathered In” is an old term that was used to describe people that had bypassed voter registration laws.

Currently, the doctors that are “grandfathered in” as Board Certified by the AAN are 80% white and 70% male.

The policy was driven by contracts between the ABMS and the physicians with lifetime certificates still grant an unjustified elite status.

In 2007, the decision was made to institute MOC programs, and doctors certified AFTER that date were required to do MOC

recertification plus CME

· self-assessment modules and improvement in medical practice modules

· the change from recertification to MOC to strengthen the program and guarantee that physicians were current in ways not immediately available for testing

Someone thought that physicians have nothing better to do with all that free time [but in reality they have]:

· patient care,

· more patients

· less reimbursement

· prior authorizations

· scheduling peer-to-peer

· spending time on peer-to-peer

· research

· teaching trainees

· EHR compliance ICD 10 so

· CME

· family and social commitments

· institutional compliance modules

Coping strategies such as career counseling meditation and yoga don’t decrease the burden of the workload.

In 2014 ABPN/ABMS MOC information session

· who came up with the modules

· why the modules recommended

· what evidence is there that the modules improve

· why should I pay for modules pay for CME and pay $1500 to take the exam

· Mayo Clinic showed no hard evidence of benefit less than 15% of doctors thought the modules were helpful or that MOC was worth the time and effort

It was like marketing a new drug without testing for efficacy or side effects, but the ABMS employees received a large amount of money for crafting the institutional policy.



Annals of IM study 2014

· Cost analysis 10-year dollars cost analysis for Internists $16,000 dollars

· 10-year run for Hematologist Oncologist was $40,000 dollars

· Revenues far larger than actual cost of the programs

· One institution 1200 physicians and $2000 a year was 2.4 million every 10 years or 240,000 per year the money would be better spent on opioid crisis or covid or patient centered activities, there were Dr days lost to the hospitals

Lost Days from physicians taking time off for the courses less time for conferences, continuing ed, patients, personal time off.

The total was 5.7 billion in physician fees from 2015 to 2025 and 33 million hours over 10 years. This was equivalent to the workload of 1785 physicians over 10 years or not graduating eight medical school classes of physicians.

ABPN receives grants from ABMS to provide more products.

ABIM 6.5 million transferred to foreign accounts[?!]

The ABIM and The ABIM foundation lost $39.8 million [in] 2013, but during the same year paid $125.7 million to senior officers ABPN CEO making $3 million per year. Officers $300,000.00 to $400,000.

NBMS does use ABPN for initial certification.

ABMS gives money to ABPN for providing the modules ABPN would not accept a request for reform

http://www.changeboardrecert.com this group includes Dept Chair, Chief of Divisions, Members of NIH, Disciplines outside of Neurology,

but ABPN did not listen, Feb 3, 2015, ABIM announced apology and suspension of modules,

Feb 16, 2015, 9 letters with 1,100 signatures.

www.endmoc.com website established, no response from ABPN

The AAN agreed that Part IV was onerous, and urged repeal of Part IV of MOC and calls on ABPN to respond positively.

The APA position statement representing 36,000 Psychiatrists supported the elimination of Part IV of MOC

The ABPN said it had no recourse. “The ABPN believes strongly that it is bound to follow the ABMS MOC standards. On its own, the ABPN does not have the authority to eliminate any Part of the MOC without risking censure by the ABMS and jeopardizing the value of our diplomates’ certificates.”

From 1970 to 2015, the growth of management and administration, was 2500%

· Physician growth was less than 500%

Since the ABMS and the ABPN had no incentive to change, NBPS was formed.

· Initial certification by ABMS

· Valid License

· At least 50 hours of ACCME accredited CME

· Active hospital privileges

· Clinical privileges have not been permanently revoked

· Cost $169.00 per year for 2 years certifies all specialties by ABMS and AOA

· Must have active privileges in a hospital in that specialty so that you are not just a good test taker

· Multiple specialties, multiple institutional representation Harvard, Mayo, Dartmouth, UCLA, NYU

· Pro physician movement, the more support the better, can be ABPN and NBPS, DO’s that pass the AOA

· Think of NBPAS as a PAC donation

· Mathews Paul MD FAAN, multiple articles in multiple journals

ABIM retaliated, what do they have to hide www.newsweek.com/certified-medicalcontroversy-320495?pianot

2022 a new compromise from ABPN, they came out with “MOC2.0”, you can do a Complete Article Assessment every 3 years or an exam every 10 years

30 for one certificate, 50 for two certificates, 70 for 3 certificates 90 for 4 certificates

The AMA did pass a resolution, about MOC, but did not take any action



NBPS A nonprofit, founded in 2015 by 20 physicians, thought leaders in clinical and academic science

Goal support continuing and rigorous lifelong learning, clinical excellence professionalism, and patient care through evidence-based CME, streamlined, does not contribute to burnout, certifies 11,000 physicians in 50 states

Accepted by over 200 hospitals and health systems

The Joint Commission and the NCQA both certify

The NCQA also certifies it certifies insurance companies. And says it is acceptable for certification

CAQH, Medicare and Medicaid, CAQH URAC

NBPS Annual revenue $433,000. Dollars. ABIM 64.3 million, ABPN 23.1 million will all be a short one

25% of physicians leaving practice from burn out within 5 years of entering practice

Physician Side Gig group on Facebook $155,000 plus looking to build a career outside of Medicine

Physician shortage growing by 124,000 by 2034

Become an NBPAS diplomate where the pin on your lapel, put it DNBPS after MD or DO on your title start petitions at your hospital forms and petitions are available at NBPAS.org

Over hundred 47 hospitals excepting and BPA

Column A and 3 items from Column B

Credentialing is easier, NBPS in now Column A

Although the bylaws are not changed, the hospitals may be able to take NBPS

Paul Mathews has sample of bylaws change formats that you can send to your hospital

American Psychiatric Association now allows certification with ABPN and or NBPS

Low lying fruit: try to work with the other State Neurological Societies have them sign on to a letter to the AAN this is how the state societies and memberships feel



How is the best way to persuade the hospitals? Point to the other hospitals, for recruitment and retention, we need to follow suit.

This will save the hospital money and generate income power points available on the NBPS website.

Also, now on the NBPS? Website, information about insurance and NBMS credentials

What should CNS do? work with CMA leadership NBPS leadership in La Jolla at Scripps. The leadership in AMA not on board, but in the HOD the membership wants the change.

Leadership in AAN getting funds for membership, committees, until 10 years ago they were the prime members not for any dishonorable reason but became “attached “to the reimbursement. The AAN had a lot of pressure from Paul Matthews, as younger generation move into position, but also APA may be understanding the burn out and are more able to understand it.

Leadership in AAN more diverse and inclusive. If there is an argument to encourage NBPS instead of MOC it has more of a chance to be successful.

PA and NP’s what to do about the lack of skill?

Try to get hospitals to use doctors that did not match instead.

· 10,000 physicians enter the match and don’t match sidelined for a year Oregon and Missouri they can get a license and work under a licensed physician.

Tell the hospitals that they can get these employees, and then they can work with a graduated salary structure to make money pay off loans if you hire them instead of NP and PAs now are mostly getting a PGL would be better than a NP or PA,

There are not enough residency slots Medicare and Medicaid fund the slots, Biden has passed a bill to increase. Unmatched are not all FMG

Often FMG’s are doctors in their own country, and their skills are outstanding.

He will be at our Spring 2025 conference clinical and Advocacy

For Credentialing, there are slide sets for NBPS on the website about MOC, credentialing, advocacy etc.



For a short amount of time Independent Medical Board, weakened the idea of ABPN and ABMS, so they did not continue with Independent Medical Board, ?? UCNS not recognized, so now headache Neuroctit will have to be ABPN

Bob Weinberg brought up SB636 the AAN has “calls for action,” where you get an email, and it leads to a letter to your own legislator” Paul will be sending out the article.

Should we add board certification to SB636, licensed and Board Certified?

We may want to do a preset letter on our website for objectives

The Ledge meeting 3rd Wednesday can take up these themes again September 18, topic on our Agenda Wednesday

for DOJ and FTC and

Steve Holtz suggested e mailing Paul and asking him

for some more specific game plans for recertification

Step A , B , C

For the September 18, 2024 meeting

Vote on whether we want to do each of these steps:

a) Have a formal letter and preset information to give to our own hospitals on our website, the best way to encourage the hospitals is to remind them about the other hospitals that have mad changes. A Headache specialist just got up a petition to his hospital we can use powerpooints from the NBPS and use the other stakeholders that have already agreed to this particularly documenting the insurance.

b) Try to do a joint project with CMA about changing from ABMS to NBPS in California

c) Have The NBPS Board president from SCRIPPS come and talk to our meeting

d) Try to do a joint project with the AMA about switching all credentialing after passing ABMS

To NBPS

e) Send a letter from CNS to the Joint Commission for Hospital Accreditation

f) Reiterate that we want to be a viable alternative

g) Reach out to other State Neurology Societies to get our National AAN and ABPN to change so that as a group we affect the leadership of the AAN and ABPN


Doctor filling out paperwork with degrees behind her
By California Neurology Society CNS April 28, 2025
UnitedHealthcare and HCSC Accept NBPAS Certification
By California Neurology Society CNS April 25, 2025
One week until Conference and Legislative Day
By California Neurology Society CNS April 17, 2025
The team discusses their upcoming meeting on April 30th at the Citizen Hotel
By California Neurology Society CNS April 17, 2025
CNS Reviews Bills and Votes on Measures of Support or Opposition
By California Neurology Society CNS April 4, 2025
Quick recap The team discussed the financial implications of transportation for people with epilepsy and proposed potential solutions, including allocating a dollar from truck registration towards retraining or local transportation budgets. They also discussed healthcare policies, particularly a bill aiming to align the standards of administering life-saving medicines to people with seizures in adult day centers with FDA standards. Lastly, they discussed the risks of head injuries in children playing tackle football and the potential for introducing a bill to raise awareness about the impact of head injuries on children's brain development. Next steps Selim to send conference information to Sean Porter. Selim to create or coordinate creation of a formal invitation for the legislative reception on May 1st. Johanna to contact Sean Porter about potential legislation sponsorship and discuss the epilepsy transportation issue. Stella to write a letter to the NFL praising them for flag football and encouraging them to promote safety in youth football. Johanna to resubmit the full CMA resolution documents, ensuring all content fits within the submission guidelines. Selim to contact the Governor's office and healthcare representatives to invite them to speak at the May 1st legislative day. Johanna to attend the CMA legislative day on May 21st, arriving the night before. Jeff to attend the CMA legislative day on May 21st. Legislative team to continue pursuing the head injury bill with potential sponsors. Johanna to follow up with Michelle Rodriguez's office about attending the May 1st reception and potentially meeting with the team. Summaries Transportation Funding for Epilepsy Patients Johanna discussed the financial implications of transportation for people with epilepsy, suggesting that those who cannot drive due to their condition should receive a portion of the taxes paid by those who can drive. She proposed a potential solution of allocating a dollar from the registration of 18-wheeler trucks towards retraining or budget for local transportation departments. Steve agreed with Johanna's points about the funding and taxation system, but expressed concerns about the feasibility of taxing truck drivers due to their strong union. The conversation ended with Stella and Nick joining the conversation. Healthcare Policy Discussion and Support Selim, Dr. Stella Legarda, Dr. Joanna Rosenthal, and Steve Cattolica met with Nick, a legislative representative, to discuss healthcare policies. They expressed support for a bill, Assembly Bill 369, which aims to align the standards of who can administer life-saving medicines to people with seizures in adult day centers with FDA standards. They also discussed the possibility of Nick's office giving a talk about the bill at their upcoming conference in Sacramento. Additionally, they mentioned a previous bill, the Levine Bill, which they supported and was recently passed. Addressing Tackle Football Risks in Children Johanna and Stella discussed the risks of head injuries in children playing tackle football, particularly in the developing brain. They mentioned a bill that partially went through last year, which required parents to sign a waiver acknowledging the risks. They also discussed a study by Boston University's CTE Center, which found that 100% of professional football players under 30 had chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Stella suggested that the National Football League should prioritize long-term brain health in children and proposed a joint resolution between the House and Senate to create an age limit for tackle football, similar to other contact sports. Addressing Head Injuries and Epilepsy In the meeting, Johanna, Stella, and Nick discussed the possibility of introducing a bill to raise awareness about the impact of head injuries on children's brain development and the subsequent challenges faced by those affected. They agreed that the bill should be the primary focus, with a resolution as a fallback option. Nick committed to discussing the idea with his team and superiors, acknowledging the challenge of securing funding in the current budget deficit. The team also discussed the potential for job training programs and transportation assistance for individuals with epilepsy who lose their driver's licenses. The conversation ended with the understanding that the issue is underserved and needs to be addressed. Bill Language and Legislative Session Nick agreed to follow up on the ideas discussed with his team and send the bill language to Stella for support. Johanna reminded Nick of a February 21st deadline for new legislation and asked about the number of bills his department was sponsoring. Nick clarified that they were limited due to the shortened session and the new member's role. Johanna proposed an invitation for Nick's department to attend the legislative session on May 1st and visit the office in the Capitol. Nick agreed to this and provided Selim with the scheduler's email. Steve expressed his appreciation for the bill and the progress it aimed to achieve. State Funding and Project Income Johanna and Stella discussed the challenges of generating income for their projects and the need to approach the state for funding. They also discussed their interactions with the Principal Consultant on the Senate Transportation Committee, Melissa White, who advised them against asking for money, suggesting instead to extend the service to the population. Johanna expressed her belief that they could find a workaround and generate income from the state, while Stella emphasized the importance of presenting their goals clearly and avoiding the perception of asking for extra money. They agreed to continue their efforts and to invite the legislative assistant to a meeting to further discuss their plans. Youth Sports Concussion Prevention Efforts Stella, Johanna, and Selim discussed the committee's legislative efforts, particularly focusing on concussion prevention in youth sports. They agreed on the need for a joint resolution between the House and the Senate to limit contact sports for under-12s, rather than a bill. They also discussed the potential for using the legislation as a bargaining chip with the NFL. Johanna mentioned that she had sent letters to the NFL and other organizations, and Stella suggested writing a letter to the NFL praising their adoption of flag football. The team also discussed the importance of Selim speaking up in meetings, as he has a strong understanding of the legislative process. Lastly, they planned to invite representatives from the Governor's office to their upcoming legislative day. Epilepsy Medication and Transportation Discussion Johanna, Stella, Jeff, and Selim discussed various topics, including epilepsy medication, transportation for epilepsy patients, and potential legislation. Stella mentioned a bill she was involved with last year, which allowed school personnel to administer epilepsy medication to students. Johanna suggested a new approach to claw back some of the money epilepsy patients pay for transportation they can't use. Jeff agreed, stating that it wouldn't cost much for transportation agencies to provide free transportation for epilepsy patients. They also discussed the possibility of bringing the issue to a state level, as opposed to individual municipalities. Selim asked about reaching out to Sean Porter, and Johanna agreed to do so. Lastly, they discussed the upcoming CMA resolutions and the possibility of attending a legislative day on May 21st.
By California Neurology Society CNS April 4, 2025
Legislative Committee Meeting Minutes Here is a summary of the meeting: Steve C: Set up a May 1 meeting with the governor’s office Health staffer. Start a template letter for staffers to present. Start a template letter to write to the DOJ regarding MOC, to co-author with Bob and Stella. Selim: Contact offices of representatives to request 15-minute meetings on May 1. Sign the organization onto CapitolTrack, with Jeff and Stella covering the monthly charge until Robyn Treasurer takes over. Organize Capitol visits to member offices with Johanna. Jeff K: Contact the CMA chief lobbyist to discuss closer cooperation on health bills on May 1. Contact Rebekah about resurrecting the youth tackle bill. Contact Ramos of Appropriations to discuss the $2M budget and also reach out to the Surgeon General. Find a speaker for an update on neuromuscular disease for the program meeting on Tuesday. Stella: Send a letter invitation to Ravindra Chandrashekh to speak on May 1 about MOC and its negative impact on patient care. Work with Johanna on the May 1 agenda, tentatively including: 8:00 -8:15 AM: "Making the Sausage" with Garrett Jansen 8:15 to 8:30 AM: "Working Together" with a CMA lobbyist 8:30 -9:00 AM: presentations about each BIll Concussion Epilepsy Prior auth and UR 10:00 AM: Questions part of the team visits offices, anyone else can stay for AAN and General neurologist MOC 11:30 AM: Lunch break 1:00 pm - 2:30 PM: Capitol tour 3:00 PM: Break 3:30 PM - 6:30 PM: CNS Reception Request an AAN speaker to discuss the need for general neurologist training emphasis while at Neurology on the Hill. Johanna: Add the need for general neurologist training emphasis to the survey. Add other items to the survey. Prepare meeting minutes with Dorian.
By Dorian Capers April 4, 2025
ABMS Maintenance of Certification (MOC) is a proprietary continuing education product that to date has no high-quality evidence that it improves patient care. The cost and burden associated with MOC remains a significant factor driving physicians out of medicine. Key Takeaways • ABMS's MOC program is criticized for lacking evidence of improving patient care and contributing to physician burnout and exit from practice. • MOC is effectively mandatory due to its integration into national credentialing systems, despite being labeled as voluntary. • Surveys show most physicians view MOC as unnecessary and financially motivated, with little clinical value beyond existing CME requirements. • The MOC program exacerbates physician shortages, impacting patient care access, especially in Healthcare Professional Shortage Areas. Editor's note: 2024 has been a year of innovation in primary care, from advancements in artificial intelligence to the growing role of value-based care. As we close out the calendar year, our "Best of 2024" series highlights Medical Economics' coverage of the past year's health care trends that have paved the way towards better patient care. The largest board certification organization in the United States, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), recently announced a record-breaking number of ABMS-certified physicians in the United States – 988,737 out of 989,323 physicians to be exact – easily cementing its monopoly status for its physician certification enterprise. Amidst their highly profitable business model is a significant, but little known, driver that is exacerbating burnout and hastening the exit of physicians from clinical practice. ABMS Maintenance of Certification (MOC) is a proprietary continuing education product that to date has no high-quality evidence that it improves patient care. The cost and burden associated with MOC remains a significant factor driving physicians out of medicine. READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE
By California Neurology Society CNS April 4, 2025
Legislative Committee Meeting Minutes Here is a summary of the meeting:  The UAPD, celebrating 52 years in business and present in six states, primarily consists of MDs, NPs, mid-levels, and some dentists. George Osborne, hired by Dr. Weinmann over 20 years ago, attended the meeting. Two UAPD-sponsored bills were signed by the governor, but SB636, despite multiple attempts over 20 years, remains vetoed. Private sector doctors can join UAPD for an annual fee of $477. The governor signed AB310, addressing data collection disparities between private and public sector services. LA County doctors, with about 1,200 members, considered a strike last year. UAPD successfully introduced AB2889 to remove punitive sanctions for unlawful strikes. The state is hiring private doctors over civil service ones, leading to a disparity in pay. Current bills include one from Assemblywoman Baines and another from Dr. Joaquin Arrambula, an ER doctor. Dr. Weber, a pediatrician from San Diego, is also involved. The supervision of NPs has been a long-standing issue, with full autonomy at the county level but not at the state level. The UAPD is concerned about scope creep and the increasing roles of mid-levels. Psychiatry needs more doctors, and there is a high turnover due to term limits. The Medical Board, now more political, is seen as disciplining doctors rather than supporting them. Dr. Klingman discussed the need for supervision of NPs. Johanna raised concerns about Medicare privatization and lack of oversight. Dr. Klingman suggested a union for private doctors. Specialists face billing challenges, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield are accused of defrauding Medicare. Hospitals are losing money and closing. The Workers Compensation doctors are exempt from duty of care. The UAPD is considering a lawsuit for discrimination and working with the California Chamber of Commerce. The idea is to involve Public Employees in Workers Compensation cases. Newsom, seen as healthcare-friendly, will be replaced in 2026. The UAPD's agenda includes engaging neurologists in the legislature and addressing issues like drug expenses and transportation for epilepsy patients. Prior authorization for neurology should involve independent neurologists, and there are concerns about the cost and effectiveness of prior authorizations. The UAPD is considering a referendum on concussions.
By California Neurology Society CNS April 4, 2025
The September 19, 2024, LEDGE meeting focused on addressing challenges in physician board certification and advocating for increased choice among certification boards. The discussion, led by Paul Matthews, centered on empowering physicians to select from multiple recertification options, emphasizing the need for competition to improve the healthcare system.  Summary of LEDGE Meeting Minutes (September 19, 2024) The September 19, 2024, LEDGE meeting focused on addressing challenges in physician board certification and advocating for increased choice among certification boards. The discussion, led by Paul Matthews, centered on empowering physicians to select from multiple recertification options, emphasizing the need for competition to improve the healthcare system. 1. Main Topic: Physician Choice in Certification ◦ Discussion led by Paul Matthews emphasized advocating for physician options among certification boards (AOA, ABPN, NBPS). ◦ The goal is to address the lack of competition in the certification space, arguing that physicians deserve multiple recertification choices. ◦ Highlighted the existing precedent: AAN endorses multiple boards (e.g., UCNS and ABPN for Neurocritical Care). 2. Action Plan and Contributors: ◦ Letter Drafting: A key strategy is to draft a letter co-signed by state neurological societies, spearheaded by Dorian , Stella , and Johanna . ◦ The letter will articulate unified support for board certification options, targeting the AAN and CMA. ◦ Paul Matthews suggested leveraging media outlets like Practical Neurology and Neurology Reviews, with potential support from Allan Rapaport, to publicize efforts. 3. Next Steps: ◦ Initial focus on collaboration with the Massachusetts Neurology Society and California Neurology Society . ◦ October 2024 is a target to engage with the California Medical Association (CMA) to build broader support. ◦ Use CMA’s House of Delegates to push for rule changes, as most delegates are reportedly sympathetic. 4. Challenges: ◦ Steve Holtz pointed out that the CMA's historical focus on surgeons and generalists limits their attention to neurology issues. ◦ Holtz emphasized prioritizing state society endorsements to "build the armory" before approaching broader entities like the AAN. 5. Key Recommendations: ◦ Garner letters of support from additional state neurology societies to create national momentum. ◦ Engage with organizations like the United Council of Neurological Subspecialties (UCNS) , already endorsed by AAN, as potential allies. ◦ Address independent boards such as the American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology and Neurodiagnostic Medicine as part of broader coalition-building efforts. 6. Conclusion: ◦ The consensus is that a coordinated, state-led initiative is crucial for influencing national organizations like the AAN. ◦ Paul Matthews stressed the importance of making the letter widely known to generate visibility and pressure that cannot be ignored.
By California Neurology Society CNS April 4, 2025
California Senate Bill 636 (SB-636) focuses on workers' compensation and the utilization review (UR) process. Introduced by Senator Cortese, the bill amends Section 4610 of the California Labor Code. Here are some key points: • Medical Professional Licensing: SB-636 requires that medical professionals performing UR for California workers' compensation claims be licensed in California • Fairness and Transparency: The bill aims to enhance fairness, transparency, and accountability within the UR process by ensuring that evaluations of medical necessity and appropriateness of treatments are conducted by qualified professionals • Governor's Veto: The bill was vetoed by Governor Newsom, citing concerns about its implementation Click here to read the Governor's letter regarding Senate Bill 636
Show More